NEW YORK - Donald Trump on Feb 28 lost a bid to pause a $454.2 million (S$600 million) civil fraud judgment against him for overstating his net worth and real estate values to dupe lenders, meaning he must soon find the cash or post a bond to prevent New York authorities from seizing his property while he appeals.

The decision by Associate Justice Anil Singh of the New York Appellate Division must be affirmed by a full panel of the mid-level state appeals court.

Mr Singh granted Trump’s request for a stay of a portion of Justice Arthur Engoron’s Feb 16 decision barring the former president from running any New York corporation or seeking loans from the state’s banks for three years.

Trump’s lawyers did not immediately respond to a request for comment on Mr Singh’s decision.

In asking for the stay earlier on Feb 28, Trump’s lawyers said he is unable to post a bond for the full amount of the judgment while he appeals and wants instead to secure a US$100 million bond.

A bonding company would be on the hook for any payout if Trump loses his appeal and proves unable to pay.

Trump is the frontrunner for the Republican nomination to challenge Democratic President Joe Biden in the Nov 5 US election.

New York Attorney-General Letitia James sued Trump, the Trump Organisation and other defendants in 2022 in state court in Manhattan, accusing them of falsifying the values of Trump’s properties to obtain better terms from lenders and insurers.

A three-month trial over the claims ended in January.

In a filing with the Appellate Division, Trump’s lawyers said a stay of Mr Engoron’s decision was needed because Trump would suffer “irreparable harm” if Ms James were free to sell his real estate assets to raise capital to pay the judgment.

The lawyers also said the “exorbitant and punitive amount of the judgment coupled with an unlawful and unconstitutional blanket prohibition on lending transactions would make it impossible to secure and post a complete bond.”

They said a US$100 million bond, together with Trump’s “vast” real estate holdings and ongoing oversight by the court-designated monitor for the Trump Organisation, would be more than sufficient to secure the judgment.

But Mr Singh’s decision means Trump may now apply for a loan to help post a bond.

In a separate filing, Ms James opposed a stay, calling it “especially inappropriate” given the defendants “all but concede” that Trump does not have enough liquid assets to satisfy the judgment.

“These are precisely the circumstances for which a full bond or deposit is necessary, where defendants’ approach would leave (the attorney-general’s office) with substantial shortfalls once this court affirms the judgment,” she wrote.

Both sides are expected to submit more written arguments in the coming weeks, and a decision could come after March 18.

Risk of evasion

Ms James also said there was “substantial risk” that Trump might not pay up, or might move assets beyond her reach, if he lost his appeal.

She cited the defendants’ having “surreptitiously” concealed from the monitor a US$40 million transfer, and Trump’s recent announcement that some of his businesses had moved to Florida.

Trump has estimated his net worth in the billions of dollars, but much of that is in real estate, not cash.

Mr Engoron imposed a US$354.9 million penalty against Trump, plus daily interest that began to accrue in 2019.

The payout had grown to US$454.2 million with interest by Feb 22, and additional interest is tacked on each day.

Trump is also seeking to avoid posting a full bond during an expected appeal of January’s US$83.3 million defamation verdict in favour of the writer E. Jean Carroll.

He has asked the judge in that case to let him appeal without posting any security, or alternatively by posting at most a US$24.5 million unsecured bond. REUTERS