Trump asks US Supreme Court to overturn Colorado ballot ban

A Supreme Court decision to grant review and back Trump could end efforts around the country to remove him from the ballot. PHOTO: REUTERS

WASHINGTON – Former US president Donald Trump asked the US Supreme Court to overturn a ruling that would bar him from the presidential ballot in Colorado, setting up a historic showdown over whether his role in the Jan 6, 2021, assault on the Capitol disqualifies him from office.

In an appeal filed on Jan 3, Trump urged the High Court to declare that he did not take part in an insurrection by trying to overturn his 2020 election loss, a push that culminated with the assault on the US Capitol.

The Colorado Supreme Court on Dec 19 declared him ineligible to reclaim the White House because of his efforts to reverse Mr Joe Biden’s win. The decision was the first ever to invoke the Constitution’s insurrection clause against a former president.

Trump told the Supreme Court that the issues were of the “utmost importance”, according to a copy of the filing viewed by Bloomberg.

“The Colorado Supreme Court decision would unconstitutionally disenfranchise millions of voters in Colorado and likely be used as a template to disenfranchise tens of millions of voters nationwide,” he argued.

The appeal marks a pivotal moment in the unprecedented national drama over Trump’s candidacy. A Supreme Court decision to grant review and back Trump could end efforts around the country to remove him from the ballot.

A ruling against Trump could fuel that drive and raise new questions about the viability of his candidacy.

Colorado is one of two states where Trump has been declared ineligible. Maine’s top election official invoked similar reasoning on Dec 28 to block him from the primary ballot there.

Other states, including California on Dec 28, have said the former president can run. 

Trump, the front runner for the Republican presidential nomination, has faced dozens of lawsuits across the country claiming he is ineligible for another term in the White House under Section 3 of the 14th Amendment.

That provision, enacted shortly after the Civil War, says that a person who took an oath to support the Constitution and then “engaged in insurrection” is ineligible to hold office again.

Trump told the Supreme Court that the events of Jan 6 “were not ‘insurrection’”. 

“‘Insurrection’ as understood at the time of the passage of the 14th Amendment meant the taking up of arms and waging war upon the United States,” his lawyers argued in the filing.

The filing was not immediately available on the Supreme Court website.

Congressional authority

The appeal said the Colorado Supreme Court made a series of errors in its interpretation of Section 3. Trump contended the president is not an “officer of the United States” subject to the insurrection clause. And he said the entire issue is an issue that Congress, not the courts, should resolve.

“By considering the question of President Trump’s eligibility and barring him from the ballot, the Colorado Supreme Court arrogated Congress’ authority,” he argued.

Trump also argues that the Colorado Supreme Court improperly relied on a report issued by the House Select Committee that investigated the Jan 6 attack, which Trump’s lawyers argued was inadmissible hearsay.

Trump also argues that the State Court should not have relied on expert testimony from a sociology professor who contended that Trump intentionally used coded language in public speeches to incite right-wing extremists, despite not conducting his own research or interviews on the matter.

Trump’s filing follows a similar appeal filed on Dec 27 by the Colorado Republican Party. The former president on Jan 3 pointed to the party’s contention that the insurrection clause is not “self-executing” – that is, that it can be enforced only after Congress sets up procedures for determining whether someone violated the provision. 

He also faulted the Colorado court, which held a five-day trial, for what he said was a “rushed” process. 

The voters suing Trump and the Colorado Secretary of State have both urged the US Supreme Court to take up the case.

The Colorado ruling will not take effect until the nation’s highest court resolves the matter one way or another. The State Court directed Colorado’s Secretary of State to keep Trump’s name on the presidential primary ballot in the meantime.

On Jan 2, Trump filed a lawsuit seeking to restore his name to Maine’s presidential primary ballot after the Secretary of State disqualified him under the 14th Amendment’s insurrection clause. 

In its 4-3 decision, the Colorado Supreme Court said Trump engaged in “overt, voluntary and direct participation” in an insurrection that culminated with the Capitol riot.

The majority pointed to Trump’s unsupported claims over the course of weeks that the election was stolen, his fiery Jan 6 speech to a crowd that included armed people, and his demands – even after rioters were storming the Capitol – that then vice-president Mike Pence refuse to certify the results.

“President Trump fully intended to – and did – aid or further the insurrectionists’ common unlawful purpose of preventing the peaceful transfer of power in this country,” the Colorado court said. The seven-justice court is composed entirely of Democratic appointees.

Political fight

Trump and his allies have argued that the efforts to ban him from state ballots is driven by politics.

Trump’s spokesman Steven Cheung said in a statement: “Democrats are obsessively violating the American voters’ constitutional right to vote for the candidate of their choice. This is an unAmerican, unconstitutional act of election interference which cannot stand.”

In addition to the Colorado case, the Supreme Court may have to resolve aspects of the four pending criminal cases against Trump. The court on Dec 22 declined to immediately consider whether he is immune from charges stemming from his effort to reverse his defeat at the polls. BLOOMBERG

Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.