HONG KONG - Several overseas activists, rights campaigners and politicians named in a national security trial for Hong Kong democrat Jimmy Lai rebutted allegations levelled by a government prosecutor in court that they colluded with him.

Lai, 76, founder of now-shuttered pro-democracy newspaper Apple Daily and a leading critic of the Communist Party of China, faces two counts of conspiracy to collude with foreign forces – including calling for sanctions against Hong Kong and Chinese officials – under a China-imposed national security law. He is also charged with conspiracy to publish seditious publications.

“Hang in there,” a supporter shouted to Lai before the proceedings on Jan 3 began, as he sat in a glass-enclosed dock surrounded by prison guards.

Earlier, prosecutor Anthony Chau accused Lai of conspiring with activist Andy Li, paralegal Chan Tsz-wah, exiled activist Finn Lau, Britain-based rights campaigner Luke de Pulford, Japanese politician Shiori Yamao, US financier Bill Browder and others to lobby foreign countries for sanctions.

Some of these individuals rejected the accusations.

Mr de Pulford, the head of the Inter-Parliamentary Alliance on China (Ipac), said on social media platform X: “Jimmy had nothing whatsoever to do with any of my work on Hong Kong at all.

“But Jimmy’s case isn’t about truth. It’s about delivering Beijing’s narrative.”

Ipac, a group of more than 300 lawmakers in 33 countries, condemned attempts to implicate several of its members in the “sham” trial, saying in a statement that these were an “unacceptable infringement of the rights of foreign citizens”.

Self-exiled Hong Kong activist Finn Lau, now based in Britain, said on X that Lai was not involved in any of his advocacy work for human rights and democracy, while calling for the immediate release of Lai and others.

At least seven others have been accused of being Lai’s agents or intermediaries in requesting sanctions. These include former US Army general Jack Keane, former US deputy defence secretary Paul Wolfowitz, former US consul-general to Hong Kong James Cunningham and Hong Kong Watch founder Benedict Rogers.

Said Mr Cunningham: “The idea that it is a crime for him (Lai) to speak to politicians, business leaders, international media and activists, as well as myself as a former diplomat, is ludicrous in the extreme.”

Mr Rogers said on X that Lai’s alleged criminal interactions with various foreigners “ought to be regarded as entirely normal legitimate activity” for a newspaper publisher.

The trial demonstrated “just how dramatically and extensively Hong Kong’s basic freedoms and the rule of law have been dismantled,” he added.

At the Jan 3 hearing, Mr Chau showed the court videos, scanned Apple Daily articles and WhatsApp messages from Lai’s personal phone. He said they showed Lai directed one of his executives on how to mobilise more protesters and contacted former British governor Chris Patten.

Mr Chau said Lai directed an assistant to liaise with Wall Street Journal columnist Bill McGurn to invite Mr Patten to make a video appealing to people to subscribe to Apple Daily in May 2020.

He also accused Lai of launching an English-language news website that month, in a push to get foreign countries to “impose sanctions” against mainland China and Hong Kong.

Mr Chau added that Lai directed one of his executives to launch a One Hongkonger, One Letter To Save Hong Kong campaign.

Such letters were meant to be sent to Donald Trump, who was then president of the United States, to ask him to confront China over the June 2020 national security law that outlawed crimes such as collusion with foreign forces, setting jail terms of life.

In a statement on Jan 3, the Commissioner’s Office of China’s Foreign Ministry in Hong Kong described Lai as an “agent and pawn of foreign anti-China forces, who has blatantly colluded with external forces to endanger national security”.

It also criticised some foreigners named in the trial for “rebelling against China”, slandering China’s policies in the city and “interfering with Hong Kong’s judicial justice”.

Both the US and Britain have called for Lai’s immediate release, saying his trial is politically motivated.

The Hong Kong authorities dispute claims that Lai will not enjoy a fair trial, saying that all are equal before the law and that the national security law has brought stability to Hong Kong after mass protests in 2019. REUTERS